|
Office Location:
650
Hawthorne Ave SE, Ste # 130
Salem,
OR 97301-5894
Phone:
503-391-9927
|
Projects & Activities
Flow
Monitoring Program
The Marion SWCD recognized a need to
provide rural landowners with flow monitoring in on small streams in Marion
County. Many of these streams had either not been monitored for water velocity
or stage or had been discontinued by USGS or only internally monitored
by Oregon Water Resources Department. The District worked for two years
to establish baseline rating curves (water velocity vs. stage relationships)
at five different locations. A rating table or curve is a relationship
between stage (or water level) and the discharge (water velocity x area
in cubic feet/second) at a cross section of the river. A number of streamflow
measurements are used to make a rating curve. Because the Marion SWCD does
not have the capability of safely measuring streamflow at high flows, the
upper limits of these rating curves to their breaking point at flood stage
where the water level would be slower to rise have not yet been established
for these locations.
To view the baseline rating curves that the district
has developed please click on the desired creek/river: Abiqua
Creek, Butte Creek, Drift
Creek, Pudding River at Selah
Springs, and Silver Creek.
These baseline rating curves are meant to be for educational/demonstrational
use only. The data shown is not to be used in any legal reference.
We have now installed permanent continuous flow
and temperature monitoring devices at these locations. Users can access
our online sensors by linking to www.automata-inc.net
and using username "marion" and password "guest." Users can then make graphs
or download data for any calendar period they choose starting in October
2006. Rating curves for each site will be completed this winter and posted
on this site. This information has been useful as Oregon DEQ has been working
to establish temperature parameters for the Pudding River Basin Total Maximum
Daily Loads, and we hope it proves a useful source of information to other
users, especially during drought or flood conditions. The City of Silverton
has partnered with us to install the site on Silver Creek to add to their
monitoring needs for that stream. Marion County Public Works also monitors
stage heights automatically at several different locations in Marion County,
and other links to local gage sites can be found on our Resources
page.
 |
 |
 |
| Conducting stream cross-section measurements |
Installing new flow monitoring stations |
Automatic flow station close-up |
Education
Programs
The Marion SWCD
has many education and outreach programs that it offers within the District.
Our clients include urban and rural residents of the District, property
owners, students, teachers, farmers, and natural resources agency staff.
We offer variety of workshops and outreach events based on the current
season and/or local concerns. Throughout the year, we also partner
with other local agencies and groups to offer programs that meet the needs
of our constituents. Here is an overview of our annual education
event calendar:
January - We coordinate a Native Plant Workshop
(prior to Native Plant Sale in February)
March - May - We coordinate a Conservation Poster Contest
for elementary school students
April - We host information booth at Earth Day at the Oregon
Garden
April - We host information booth at Oregon
Ag Fest
May - Envirothon
- We coordinate this statewide natural resources competition for high school
students
May - Down by the Riverside - We assist with this education
event for local elementary students
July - We display Conservation Posters at the Marion County Fair
for voting; host information booth
July - Canon Envirothon
- We attend the North American natural resources competition for high school
students
August - We provide conservation presentations at the Oregon
State Fair
Fall/Winter - We host local workshops, tours, and lectures
If you would like more information about any of our education programs,
please call the District office at 503-391-9927 or e-mail marion.swcd@oacd.org.
The best way to find out about upcoming events is to have your name added
to the mailing list for our quarterly newsletter, Conservation Insider.
We also do a few special mailings a year to announce events. Contact
us today to have your name added.
Agricultural
Water Quality Management Plans
The Agricultural Water Quality Management
Program administered by the Oregon Department of Agriculture's (ODA) Natural
Resources Division, is responsible for addressing water pollution associated
with agricultural lands and activities. The Agricultural Water Quality
Management Program has evolved in response to requirements under various
state and federal laws, such as the Clean Water Act.
In 1993, the Oregon Legislature passed Senate
Bill 1010 or the Agricultural Water Quality Management Act, which provides
for ODA to be the lead state agency working with agriculture to address
water pollution. Through the Agricultural Water Quality Management Act
(AgWQM Act), ODA is authorized to develop and carry out a water quality
management plan for any agricultural or rural lands area whenever a water
quality management plan is required by state or federal law.
In 1995, the Oregon Legislature passed Senate
Bill 502 (ORS 561.191) which stipulates that ODA "shall develop and implement
any program or rules that directly regulate farming practices that are
for the purpose of protecting water quality and that are applicable to
areas of the state designated as exclusive farm use zones or other agricultural
lands." The implications of this legislation are that in Oregon, ODA is
the agency solely responsible for regulating agricultural activities that
affect water quality.
The AgWQM Act directs ODA to work with farmers
and ranchers to develop Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plans
(AgWQM Area Plans) for watersheds. Basically, it provides a framework for
ODA to develop watershed based plans which identify measures and strategies
necessary for landowners to prevent and control water pollution resulting
from agricultural activities. The AgWQM Act watershed planning process
is begun by ODA once water quality issues in a watershed have been identified
and a watershed plan is required by state or federal law. One example of
such a "trigger" for the planning process is a listing under section 303(d)
of the federal Clean Water Act.
ODA, in consultation with other state agencies,
determines priority watersheds for development of AgWQM Area Plans. Through
its locally based planners, ODA assembles a Local Advisory Committee consisting
of stakeholders residing in the watershed. The committee is responsible
for developing a draft action plan to address water quality issues arising
from agricultural activities and soil erosion on rural lands. Under the
AgWQM Area Plan, local operators will be asked to deal with identified
problems such as soil erosion, crop nutrient loss from fields, or degraded
streamside areas. The AgWQM Act provides flexibility so that landowners
in each watershed are able to develop their own approaches to local problems.
Farmers and ranchers are allowed to choose their own ways of meeting established
water quality goals. ODA does not want to "sit in the tractor seat" with
Oregon farmers and ranchers, but rather to give them an opportunity to
manage their own business as long as they are following their local AgWQM
Area Plan to help meet watershed goals and objectives. However, those
who are asked to deal with a problem but continually refuse to do so could
be assessed a civil penalty.
Benefits of the Agricultural Water Quality Management
Act include:
providing a mechanism for agriculture to address
water quality issues in watersheds identified as water quality limited
maintaining flexibility for landowners to address
site specific issues to meet overall water quality goals
promoting coordinated watershed planning and
avoids "one size fits all" approaches
helping landowners and others understand the
cumulative effects and benefits of individual actions
providing a forum to summarize and present
the actions being taken by agriculture to overcome water quality problems
resulting from agricultural activities.
Click
to see a map of the state showing all of the planned and proposed basins.
Information on this section was obtained from the Natural Resources Division
of the Oregon Department of Agriculture. You can see their website
for more information.
Molalla-Pudding-French
Prairie-
North
Santiam Subbasin Plan
ADOPTED JANUARY
2002
PLAN
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
The Agricultural Water Quality Management (AgWQM)
Area Plan provides guidance for addressing agricultural water quality issues
in the Molalla-Pudding-French Prairie-North Santiam Subbasins. The
purpose of the plan is to identify strategies to reduce water pollution
from agricultural lands through a combination of education programs, suggested
land treatments, management activities, and monitoring.
The plan was created in response to Senate Bill
1010, which requires the reduction of pollution from agricultural sources.
It was developed by a Local Advisory Committee (LAC) consisting of affected
landowners residing within the basin, with assistance from the Oregon Department
of Agriculture and the Marion Soil and Water Conservation District.
The plan applies to all lands, regardless of size, within the Molalla-Pudding-French
Prairie-North Santiam Subbasins that are outside the urban growth boundaries
and also not covered by Forest Practices Act.
MISSION
The mission of this plan is to produce sound
agriculture conservation within a framework of economic profitability and
agricultural viability. The plan is designed to achieve chemical,
physical, and biological water quality standards as outlined in the Clean
Water Act.
The LAC committee used the following guiding principles
in the development of this plan:
Control pollution as close to the source as possible.
Base actions on scientifically based conservation
planning.
Promote a variety of conservation practices that
allows individual landowners the flexibility to address their situations
on their own land.
Recognize the need for producers to maintain agricultural
profitability.
Protect beneficial uses of water in the Molalla-Pudding-French
Prairie-North Santiam Subbasins.
IMPLEMENTATION AND COMPLIANCE
The AgWQM Area Plan encourages producers to develop
Voluntary Conservation Plans, which outline management strategies for addressing
pollution. Voluntary Conservation Plans are developed by the landowner,
with assistance from the Marion Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD)
who works cooperatively with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA),
Natural Resource Conservation Service, USDA Farm Service Agency, and OSU
Extension Service.
While the emphasis of the plan is on voluntary
action by landowners or occupiers to control the factors affecting water
quality in the Molalla-Pudding-French Prairie-North Santiam Subbasins,
the Prevention and Control Measures are outlined as a set of minimum standards
that must be met on all rural lands. Landowners or occupiers who
fail to address these Prevention and Control Measures with or without an
individual conservation plan may be subject to the enforcement authority
of the Oregon Department of Agriculture under administrative rules for
the Molalla-Pudding-French Prairie-North Santiam Subbasins and Oregon Administrative
Rules (OARs) 603-095-1900 through 603-095-1980.
PREVENTION AND CONTROL MEASURES
MOLALLA-PUDDING-FRENCH PRAIRIE-NORTH SANTIAM
SUBBASINS
Prevention and control measures (PCMs) provide
guidance to help landowners and operators reduce water pollution from all
agricultural and rural lands. The following table summarizes the
prevention and control measures that must be met on all agricultural or
rural land, indicators of non-compliance, and the management practices
that will address the problems.
| |
PCMs
|
Minimum standards
to meet
|
Clear indicators
of non-compliance
|
Example best management practices
|
| 1 |
Chemigated Irrigation Water |
Prevent chemigation runoff from entering state
waters |
Visible runoff into water or evidence of runoff
|
Riparian buffers
Waste storage structures
Filter strips
|
| 2 |
Surface Drainage
& Irrigation Ditches |
Prevent movement of pollutants or runoff into
state waters |
Visible soil erosion from excessive channel slope
|
Streambank stabilization
Grassed waterways
|
| 3 |
Erosion Prevention
& Sediment Control |
Soil erosion rate should be below 5T/Ac/yr |
Sediment accumulation in waterways
Visible rills or gullies
Muddy runoff
|
Cover crops
Filter strips
Buffer areas
Residue management
|
| 4 |
Irrigation
Management |
No irrigation runoff from fields into state waters |
Visible irrigation runoff into water or evidence
of runoff
|
Filter strips and buffers
Integrated water management
Equipment calibration & maintenance
|
| 5 |
Waste
Management - Livestock & Other |
Prevent movement of livestock waste or runoff
into state waters |
Runoff from livestock facilities into water
Waste accumulation in a vulnerable area
|
Vegetative buffer areas
Seasonal grazing
Fencing
Off-stream watering
|
| 6 |
Nutrient
Management |
Prevent crop nutrient applications that have
adverse impacts on state waters |
Nutrients applied to water
Visible trail of compost, ash, or biosolids to water
|
Use current fertilizer guides
Use modern practices
Maintain & calibrate equipment
|
| 7 |
Pesticide
Management |
Use all pesticides according to label requirements |
Pesticide applied to open water
Contamination of water source
Improper disposal of containers
|
Follow label & calibrate sprayer
Vegetative buffer strips
Leakproof storage pad
Integrated pest management
|
| 8 |
Riparian
Management Areas |
Streamside areas will be managed to allow establishment
and growth of riparian vegetation appropriate to site; vegetation must
be sufficient to provide shade and protect streambanks during 25-yr flood
events |
Active stream bank erosion due to destruction of
vegetation
|
Riparian buffer zones
Protect streambanks
Filter strips
Forest buffers
Exclusion zones or limited use areas
|
| 9 |
Roads &
Staging Areas |
Roads shall be constructed and maintained to
prevent sediment and/or contaminants from entering state waters |
Surface runoff carrying contaminants into state waters
Pesticide or oil cans stored outdoors
|
Appropriate design & construction
Roadside seeding & critical area vegetation
Water bars
Grading roads
Heavy Use Protection
|
For additional information about
the Molalla-Pudding-French Prairie-North Santiam Subbasins Agricultural
Water Quality Management Area Plan, please call the Marion SWCD at (503)
391-9927. For a complete copy of the plan, stop by the SWCD
office located at 3867 Wolverine St NE, Building F, Suite 16 in Salem.
The plan may also be downloaded from the Oregon Department of Agriculture's
website.
Conservation
Planning
Marion SWCD along with the Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) provides conservation planning and technical
assistance to clients (individuals, groups, and units of government). These
clients develop and implement conservation plans to protect, conserve,
and enhance natural resources (soil, water, air, plants, and animals) within
their related social and economic interests.
Conservation planning is a natural resource problem-solving
and management process. The process integrates ecological (natural resource),
economic, and social considerations to meet private and public needs. This
approach, which emphasizes identifying desired future conditions, improves
natural resource management, minimizes conflict, and addresses problems
and opportunities.
The success of conservation planning and implementation
depends upon the voluntary participation of clients. The planning process
used by Marion SWCD and NRCS is based on the premise that clients will
make and implement sound decisions if they understand their resources,
natural resource problems and opportunities, and the effects of their decisions.
Conservation planning helps clients, conservationists,
and others view the environment as a living system of which humans are
an integral part. It enables clients and planners to analyze and work with
complex natural processes in definable and measurable terms. The
objective in conservation planning is the sound use and management of soil,
water, air, plant, and animal resources to prevent their degradation and
ensure their sustained use and productivity while also considering related
human social and economic needs.
Please stop by or call our office
(503-391-9927) if you are interested in learning more about conservation
planning on your land. For more detailed information on the conservation
planning process, please see our Conservation Planning
page.
Pudding River Water Quality
Monitoring
Program
Quality Assurance Project
Plan Summary
Developed in 2002
Background
Marion County, the Pudding River Watershed Council
and the Marion Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) formed a partnership
to conduct a water quality monitoring program in the Pudding River watershed.
The program was established to comply with the Federal Clean Water and
Endangered Species Acts. It also provides a means for residents to
learn about their watershed, take a more active role in data collection
and to become more informed about future decision-making and restoration
efforts. The SWCD has established a long-term water monitoring program
to be based on the Agricultural Water Quality Management Plan (AgWQMP)
for the Molalla-Pudding-French Prairie, and North Santiam River Basins
(Senate Bill 1010). It is the intent of the SWCD to determine the
baseline conditions and identify trends in water quality. You may
view the district's Stormwater
Graphs to better compare the various testing stations' data.
The Pudding River Watershed is located in the
Mid Willamette Valley, draining the Western Cascade foothills. The
River is 62 miles long and drains 480 square miles of central Marion County
and southern Clackamas County. The headwaters for the main stem are
in the low elevation of the Waldo Hills, with some of the tributaries originating
at higher elevations of the Cascade Range. These tributaries include
Butte, Abiqua and Silver Creeks. The headwaters of these creeks are
generally heavily forested with Douglas fir, red alder, Western red cedar
and Western hemlock. The timber and headwaters are owned by timber
companies, the Oregon Department of Forestry (ODF), the United States Forest
Service (USFS) and the United States Bureau of Land Management (BLM).
Private and state timber land is managed in compliance with the Oregon
Forest Practices Act, while the BLM manages land under its jurisdiction
according to the Northwest Forest Management Plan. ODF has instituted
a Forest Practices Monitoring Program to evaluate forest practices on private
land and coordinate ODF, USFS and BLM research and monitoring activities.
The remainder of the basin is in mostly agricultural use, although the
cities of Aurora, Donald, Hubbard, Woodburn, Mt. Angel, Silverton, the
community of Brooks and the eastern edge of Salem are also located in the
watershed.
The Pudding River and its tributaries are potential
habitat for numerous fish species. The native fish species include:
Winter steelhead salmon, Spring chinook, cutthroat trout, rainbow trout,
Oregon chub, Pacific lamprey, speckled dace, redside shiner, and assorted
sculpins. The non-native species include: largemouth bass, carp,
bullhead catfish, bluegill, and crappie. The Oregon chub is listed
as Endangered, however, research by Paul Scheerer at Oregon State University
(http://www.orst.edu/Dept/ODFW/freshwater/inventory/chub.html)
did not find any chub in the Pudding River or its tributaries. The
Pudding River, Abiqua Creek and Silver Creek provide winter steelhead and
Chinook salmon habitat (both listed as Threatened). While coastal
cutthroat trout have been listed as Threatened, the resident cutthroat
found in the Pudding River are not. It should also be noted that
the Pacific lamprey has been listed as a species of concern.
Project Objectives and Goals
There is considerable interest in water quality
monitoring in the Pudding River watershed by the public, especially those
who have served on the Local Advisory committee for the AgWQMP and the
Pudding River Watershed Council. The monitoring project is also a
priority for local government agencies including Marion County and MSWCD.
Several short-term monitoring projects have occurred in the watershed,
but many gaps and questions still remain as to the actual health and problems
that are associated with land use activities in the area. The questions
to be answered as a result of this project are: Which tributaries (establish
a ranking order) contribute quality limiting parameters to the Pudding
River? Is there a difference in water quality upstream and downstream
from different land uses? What or where are the impacts that cause
the listed streams to be on the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
(DEQ) state list for water quality limited bodies, the 303(d) list?
As a result the goals for this project are as follows:
-
Watershed Assessment and Baseline Data Collection:
Collect data on water quality and quantity to supplement existing data
and fill in gaps where no regular monitoring is occurring. The data
is needed to characterize current conditions, compare results with studies
from the recent past, and to establish a baseline for the watershed in
relation to, and for use in future projects or management of water quality.
-
Rank Tributaries: Results from the monitoring project
will be used to characterize the loads that the different tributaries are
contributing to the main stem river, and identify any needs for more specialized
studies.
-
Address Point Source Pollution: Determine if a significant
difference exists upstream and downstream of point sources. Also
compare measurements in stream segments that drain predominantly different
land uses.
-
Education: The program will help educate local
school children through after-school programs, and also watershed residents
about biological, physical, and chemical water quality monitoring techniques.
These parameters are key components to understanding the issues concerning
the health of the watershed. Several reports and workshops will be
designed to help with the outreach programs. The main target area
for the Marion SWCD will be with small acreage landowners concerning agricultural
practices. These landowners have been a targeted group for education
on water quality programs by the Local Advisory Committee for the AgWQMP.
Marion County education and outreach efforts will be directed to property
owners and all others who live and/or work in the watershed and concern
non-agricultural activities that may affect water quality. The Watershed
council will direct its efforts towards all interested groups within the
study area.
-
Develop Water Quality Plans: The project will collect
data to support the implementation of the goals set up by the AgWQMP.
The data will also be used to support the development of the DEQ Total
Maximum Daily Loads, and help to address/clarify the issues that cause
the listing of streams in the study area that are on the states 303(d)
listing. The implementation of these plans will be accomplished with
conservation plans developed with individual property owners.
-
Assess Effectiveness of Existing Land Use Regulations
in Protecting Water Quality: Data will be collected to determine how different
land use activities contribute to water quality and watershed health and
how effective existing land use regulations and Best Management Practices
are in reducing impacts of land use activities on water quality.
Project Description
This project is an ongoing, long-term monitoring
program. The first phase ran from May 2002 through May 2003.
After that the project has been evaluated and refocused to different areas
or types of sampling. It is understood that in order to accomplish
a program for establishing baseline conditions, a study time line would
be in the realm of 3-5 years.
Monthly surface water measurements of temperature,
dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity and turbidity have been collected at
eleven sites within the watershed. Other sites in the project include
testing by the City of Silverton at their wastewater treatment plant and
the intake at the drinking water treatment plant. The Oregon Garden
also monitors water quality at the outflow of their detention ponds (which
receive water from the City of Silverton’s wastewater treatment plant).
Additional observations that are documented during each site visit include
recent rainfall, weather, water color, changes to vegetation, wildlife
and recent events in the watershed that may influence water quality at
that site. E. coli will be sampled for on a quarterly basis (spring,
summer, fall, winter). There are five sampling periods each quarter,
with some of these quarters including all five samplings within a 30-day
period. This allows the monitoring team to determine whether streams
meet the 30-day log mean average criteria set by the State of Oregon.
Continuous temperature monitoring is also be conducted at all of the baseline
sites. Timing for the continuous data collection will be from June
through September on a yearly basis.
All procedures for determining water quality will
follow the DEQ/OWEB protocols as described in the Oregon Plan for Salmon
and Watersheds, Water Quality Monitoring Technical Guidebook. All
protocols will also cross-reference the EPA volunteer monitor’s guide to
quality assurance project plans. The following table summarizes the
sampling frequency, responsible data collector, and method of analysis
for each parameter.
|
# of Sites
|
Parameters
|
Sampling Frequency
|
Data Collection Responsibility
|
Method
|
Fourteen and
Ten
|
Temperature
|
Monthly and Continuous
|
Monitoring Team
|
Conductivity Meter/
Thermometer dataloggers
|
|
Fourteen
|
Turbidity
|
Monthly
|
Monitoring team
|
Portable field meter
|
|
Fourteen
|
pH
|
Monthly
|
Monitoring team
|
Portable field meter
|
|
Fourteen
|
Dissolved Oxygen
|
Monthly
|
Monitoring team
|
Winkler titration kit
|
|
Fourteen
|
Conductivity
|
Monthly
|
Monitoring team
|
Portable field meter
|
| |
Flow
Being Developed
|
Monthly or continuous
|
Marion SWCD
|
Flow meter
|
|
Fourteen
|
E. coli
|
Quarterly
5 times/qtr.
|
Monitoring team
|
Colilert Quanti-Tray
|
The locations for the baseline monitoring
sites are shown in the following table.
|
Site name
|
Location
|
Predominant Upstream Land Use
|
Elevation
Ft.
|
|
Butte Creek 1
|
Hwy 211
|
Mixture: rural residential, agriculture,
forestry
|
120
|
|
Butte Creek 2
|
Butte Creek Rd.
|
Mixture: agriculture, forestry
|
500
|
|
Little Pudding River 1
|
Rambler Dr. Bridge
|
Mixture: rural residential, agriculture,
urban residential
|
130
|
|
Zollner Creek 1
|
Monitor-Mckee Rd.
|
Mixture: rural residential, agriculture
|
120
|
|
Abiqua Creek 1
|
Gallon House Rd. Bridge
|
Mixture: rural residential agriculture, forestry
|
160
|
|
Abiqua Creek 2
|
Hwy 213
|
Mixture: rural residential agriculture forestry
|
300
|
|
Abiqua Creek 3
|
City of Silverton drinking water treatment
plant intake
|
Forestry
|
480
|
|
Silver Creek 1
|
City of Silverton wastewater treatment plant
(downstream)
|
Mixture: rural residential, agriculture,
forestry
|
200
|
|
Silver Creek 2
|
Silverton Municipal Reservoir
|
Mixture: rural residential agriculture forestry
|
450
|
|
Silver Creek 3
|
Silver Falls State Park
Hwy 214
|
Mixture: state park, forestry
|
480
|
|
Brush Creek 1
|
Oregon Garden
|
Mixture: rural residential, agriculture,
forestry
|
350
|
|
Pudding River 1
|
Hazelgreen Rd.
|
Mixture: rural residential, agriculture
|
150
|
|
Pudding River 2
|
Selah Springs Rd.
|
Mixture: rural residential, agriculture
|
160
|
|
Pudding River 3
|
Upper Fork at Cascade Hwy
|
Agriculture
|
650
|
Methods and Materials
The baseline water quality monitoring is being
conducted using the standard protocols described in the DEQ Water Quality
Monitoring Guidebook for: stream temperature, pH, turbidity, conductivity,
dissolved oxygen, and E. coli.
Project Oversight and Reporting
The Marion SWCD and county staff will make up
the oversight committee responsible for reviewing the entire monitoring
project on a quarterly to bi-annual basis. The oversight committee
also receives guidance and advice from state agencies. The oversight
committee trains all new volunteers before any monitoring activities are
done, and schedule refresher training sessions as needed. All field
activities may be reviewed by state agency QA staff (DEQ) at the request
of the monitoring team. The QA officer performs data quality audits
once a year and any/all identified procedural problems will be corrected
based on the recommendations by the QA officer. Quarterly presentations
of results will be given at Watershed Council meetings and other venues
within the watershed to interested community groups. The reports will include
results, analysis and interpretation as will as pertinent field observations
and QA/QC assessments.
Program Report
Our 2005-06 Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring
Program Report report is now available online! Click
here to download the report as a PDF document. Marion SWCD staff
Scott Eden and Marcie Hagen prepared the report with the assistance of
many partners and volunteers. The report describes the goals and
strategies of our program and shows the results of our monitoring, which
began in 2002.
| If
you would like to volunteer to help with the water quality monitoring effort,
please contact Scott Eden
at Marion SWCD, 503-391-9927. |
Marion Soil & Water Conservation District
has started a new tradition! We are now holding an annual Native
Plant & Tree Sale each February. We plan to hold the sale each
year as a way to encourage more people to use native plants in their yards,
on their farms, or at their businesses. Native plants will help to
enhance your yard or garden by providing food and shelter for birds and
other wildlife. Also, once they are established, they require less
water and maintenance since they are already adapted to our climate and
soils!
At the sale, we feature deciduous and evergreen
plants, shrubs and trees. Most of the plant stock will be sold as
bare root seedlings at a cost starting at $0.75 each. A few will
be sold as potted plants. There is no minimum purchase required and
plants will be sold on a first come, first serve basis. Our staff
and volunteers will assist you with questions about the plants and provide
labels for the plants that are sold.
The sale is held at the First Church of the Nazarene
in Salem (located at 16th & Market St NE). For more information,
or if you would like to volunteer at the sale, please call the Marion SWCD
office at 503-391-9927. You can ask to be put onto our mailing list
so that you will receive notice about our next Native Plant & Tree
Sale. See our Meetings
& Events page for information on this year's sale.
To see pictures of western Oregon native plants,
see our
native plant gallery.
| If
you would like to volunteer to help with the Native Plant and Tree Sale,
please contact Marion SWCD at 503-391-9927. |
Annual
Reports
These reports are annual summaries of
the work and finances of the Marion SWCD. They are published each
year in the fall after the wrap-up of our fiscal year (July 1 - June 30).
This report now takes the place of our fall issue of the Conservation Insider,
our quarterly newsletter. To subscribe to our free newsletter, e-mail
us at marion.swcd@oacd.org.
Pudding
Pesticide Stewardship
The
Marion Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) partnered with the Oregon
DEQ, OSU Extension Service, Agriculture businesses and other partners to
address potential pesticide issues in local streams. This Pesticide
Stewardship Partnership (PSP) project was funded using federal money and
local matching funds. The study area includes agricultural streams of the
Pudding basin near Mt. Angel such as Zollner Creek, which has been the focus
of many research articles since the early 1990’s when a number of different
herbicides and pesticides were documented exceeding levels set for aquatic
life. Due to changing agricultural practices, some of the chemicals found
in the older studies are no longer used, but may be found in stream
sediments, while newly introduced chemicals may begin appearing in water
samples. Even low concentrations of pesticides in local streams can pose
serious threats to aquatic life and to migrating salmon.
The
partnership utilized a voluntary approach and enlisted the aid and expertise
of local growers and businesses interested in improving water quality in
local streams without having new regulations imposed. Objectives
included determining risks posed by current use organophosphate insecticides
and triazine herbicides in the study area of the Pudding River basin by
monitoring water samples, associating land uses with detected pesticides and
application timing, measuring flow in local streams and identifying and
promoting best management practices to reduce high risk pesticide
detections. A final DEQ report on findings from three years of recent water
sampling related to this project is to come out in early 2008.
The
Pudding River PSP partnered with iSNAP (Integrated Soil Nutrient and Pest)
educational program to provide speakers on drift reduction, IPM, etc. at a
Dec. 14th 2006 forum held at the Aurora Research Station. The forum provided
outreach and education by experts in the field on techniques to minimize
drift and employ IPM in orchards and perennial crops.
Related to this outreach, the SWCD has also partner with the DEQ to help
hold two anonymous Waste Pesticide Collection events in the watershed at
Wilco facilities in Mt. Angel and Donald to help growers safely dispose of
outdated chemicals and raise awareness of their potential harm to aquatic
life. The outreach included targeted mailings to grower and fertilizer and
pesticide distributors and applicators. The total from both events is more
than 30,000 pounds of waste pesticides collected from 80 growers and
included many “legacy” banned pesticides such as DDT and Chlordane. For
additional web resources related to IPMs please check out our
Resources
& Links.
In the three years
since the DEQ has been collecting grab samples at eight locations in the
Pudding basin for organophosphate insecticides and triazine herbicides,
there has been very high detections in the Zollner / Bochsler Creek subbasin, moderately
high detections in the Little Pudding subbasin, and low detections in the
Pudding mainstem, while Abiqua and Silver Creek have had no detections. In
the impacted basins, multiple detections of the insecticide chlorpyrifos
over the chronic water quality standard have been made. The insecticide
Guthion (azinphos-methyl) has not been detected since one large detection
was observed in 2005. Diazinon and Ethoprop detections have been noted and
have increased since 2005. Overall, there have been moderate fluctuations in
detection frequency and concentrations of most pesticides with no currently
discernable trends. Sampling is continuing and trends will be evaluated.

Marion SWCD also partnered with OSU Extension and
others to hold two sprayer calibration workshops for growers in the fall of
2007. This was our final outreach event of the Pudding River Pesticide
Stewardship Network. The workshops were well attended and had excellent
presentations on area water quality, pesticide application laws, nozzle
selection, calibrations, drift reduction techniques and other best
management practices to reduce off-target pesticide transport.
Of the six chosen sampling locations in the Pudding
basin, two were found to have higher levels and frequencies of detections;
Zollner and Bochsler Creek, followed by the Little Pudding River and then
the Lower Pudding River. Findings so far from 2005-06 and early ‘07 data
show that azinphos methyl has not been detected in the basin since early
2005, when a single sample was recorded at a level 400 times the chronic
aquatic life water quality standard, while other pesticides such as simazine,
atrazine, chlorpyrifos, diazon, dimethoate, and ethoprop have fluctuated in
concentrations with no discernable trends yet. Median chlorpyrifos
concentrations have been near the chronic water quality standard, while
maximum concentrations of this insecticide have exceeded the acute water
quality standard, indicating it could be a threat to aquatic life in the
locations it was detected.
Related Research Articles
(obtained
from http://californiaagriculture.ucop.edu/0501JFM/toc.html):
Food Quality Protection
Act launches search for pest management alternatives
Van Steenwyk, Zalom
Organophosphate insecticides
have allowed large yield increases, but under the FQPA many will be cancelled.
Alternatives are needed to maintain a viable state agricultural industry.
*FULL
TEXT ARTICLE (PDF)
Managing resistance is
critical to future use of pyrethroids and neonicotinoids
Zalom, Toscano, Byrne
Pyrethroids and neonicotinoids
have become important replacements for organophosphates, but resistance
and nontarget impacts have been already identified.
*FULL
TEXT ARTICLE (PDF)
Pheromone mating disruption
offers selective management options for key pests
Welter et al.
Mating disruption can control
insects; new pheromone-dispersal technologies are more effective, but insecticides
are sometimes still necessary.
*FULL
TEXT ARTICLE (PDF)
Biological and cultural
controls . . .
Nonpesticide alternatives
can suppress crop pests
Mills, Daane
Natural enemies of pests
play an important role in preventing crop damage; cultural practices can
also reduce the susceptibility of a crop to pests.
*FULL
TEXT ARTICLE (PDF)
Various novel insecticides
are less toxic to humans, more specific to key pests
Grafton-Cardwell et al.
A number of newly registered
insecticides have low mammalian toxicity and target specific crop pests;
however, resistance and secondary pest outbreaks must be managed.
*FULL
TEXT ARTICLE (PDF)
Microorganisms and their
byproducts, nematodes, oils and particle films have important agricultural
uses
Godfrey et al.
Insect pathogens are potentially
effective, but their commercial use — except Bt — has been limited; metabolic
compounds from microorganisms and oils are widely used in pest control.
*FULL
TEXT ARTICLE (PDF)
*Content Disclaimer:
All the Information
provided on this web site is provided for informational purposes only.
Information on this web site is subject to change without prior notice.
Although every reasonable effort is made to present current and accurate
information, MSWCD makes no guarantees that the Information is in fact
current and accurate, nor does it make any other guarantees. The MSWCD
web site may contain information that is created and maintained by a variety
of sources, including sources external to MSWCD does not moderate these
other sites, which may contain the personal opinions and other expressions
of the persons who post the entries appearing on those sites. MSWCD does
not control, monitor, or guarantee the information contained in these sites,
or information contained in links to other external web sites, and does
not endorse any views expressed therein or any products or services offered
therein.
|